Past is like a big box that holds in it memories, colours, tears, smiles
and sometimes anger and dispair. It's this past in which our stories are
written. The stories of our homeland, the history of the political, the story
of our identities, the stories of our lives. And when we open this box to bring
up stories and invest the future with meaning, it worths to learn to see those
stories through a collective perspective. Because it is this collective
perspective which transforms our individual experience into a peaceful protest
for a future that is better than the past.
In this place, 100 years ago, two nations used to share the same land.
Sometimes in peace and sometimes under a lot of difficulties. Religion and
nation was what seperated them, but the warm summer noons and the same sky was
what brought them united. Tourkish and Greeks, Muslims and Christians, felt
this place, all of them, their homeland. At this time, though, due to the
establishment of the nationalistic ideas, both in the greek political scene and
the tourkish, millions of people were forced to violently abandon their
homeland, in which they used to live till this time, so that a big national
political aim be implemented: “Every nation must have its own state”. And
somewhat like this, the borders of the two nations were defined, Greeks and Turkish,
just after the collapse of the Ottoman Empire and just before the start of the
Balkan wars.
Our national identities are deeply embedded now in our psyche, they
define a big part of our life. Our customs, way of thinking, language, our
religion, our limitations, perhaps even our dictations that we want to brake.
However, our national identities have their own history through time. They are
neither non-historical concepts, outside of the place and time, nor static and
unchangeable. They are more like of a plasticine, created by the French
Revolution and formed in a way that responds to the needs of a nation that
became free from feudalism and pursued more democratic structures, through the
existance of a shared connection- identity among the people. The concequences
of the French Revolution were to affect, many decades later, what was then the
Ottoman Empire, which till then understood, recognized and formed based on the
religious identity, the Christian and the Muslim. History, however, has taught
us that big political shifts are almost never held peacefully, but abruptly and
violently.
One thousand years after the fermentation of the concept of nationalism
and the nation-state in the region of Mediterrenean, the shift from the
religious to the national identity was held through the violent exchange of
populations, christians and muslims, greeks and turkish respectively, in 1923.
This large prologue was brought in my mind to offer you a sense of what
was my journey in Fokea like, of Mr. F that I met there and the thoughts that
crossed my mind.
In Fokea, we visited a museum full of memories, objects, photos and
handmade emdroidery from the years after the Population Exchange. There we met
Mr. F.
Mr. F is one of those people whose family took the decision not to leave
their house in Turkey during the exchange, but rather stay behind holding this
big burden of a quite bizarre choice. They signed their shift to Islam and
become Muslim. He guided us through the museum and it was like he was guiding
us through his own life. Though only in the end of the tour he made THE
question, which I have learned to dislike because of an oppressed childhood
from two very strict orthodox parents.
-
Who
is Orthodox?
Someone showed
towards me, while I feel a knot in my heart because of this identity that was
given to me, without being able to choose it, very carefully and very
personally. I didn’t say anything, I just let the moment rush like I wasn’t
there.
-
“Come
with me”, he said, and I followed him to a small room inside the museum.“I want
to give you this icon of Saint Sotiria. Take it as a gift from me”.
-
“Thank
you very much. I will give it to my mother who believes in God. I am sure she
will like it very much, because my family also has origins from Izmir”.
And somehow, like this, seeing his emotions in his moved eyes, I felt
that all those thoughts that I had done with my imagination, which seemed like
a fairytale, quite unreal, including boats and persecutions, oppression and
hatred between people from both sides of the Eagean, it was a harsh past
reality for him and his family. I could do nothing less than to forget for a
while my oppressed childhood and accept his emotions, not in political terms,
but more in emotional ones.
History has its own paradox and not accidentally. There are these
transcendental identities that give you the impression that history can be
turned into a personal choice just for a while. Mr. F had such a transcendental
identity that urged him to overcome the mandatory national and religious
identities of the age and to accept an identity which he didn’t choose as well-
his shift to Islam. Mr. F is a
communist. That is what he whispered to me, while we were having a cay at a
local café.
For these reasons, it is
interesting to talk about these transcendental identities, because they shed
light to a part of the history that stayed in the dark for decades. This is
because the stories of the specific population exchange are stories of violent
repatriations, stories of survival and hatred. And these stories can be found
easily in textbooks, in days of remembrances of both countries, they are told
by our grandparents and relatives, you read them and hear them somewhere
accidentally. Though, you won’t find easily the story of Mr. F, you will not
hear or read it anywhere, but only in the place that it was born.
The communist and labor consciousness of Mr. F helped him to see and
give meaning to his life, outside the realms of the narrow national and
religious identity. He got connected with the people around you with the
criterion of class, and not on the basis of nationality and religion. His
identities urged him to overcome the bifurcation of “whether you will leave
Turkey as a Greek Orthodox or you will stay as a Muslim” and stayed in Turkey
as a communist. Because for him, the importance was not hidden in whether
someone is muslim or orthodox, Greek or Turkish, but rather on the fact that
the struggle of the classes was and would still be a reality.
Mr. F and every Mr. F give through their choices these third, distanced
and wise answer to all those who believe that our countries should be
mono-ethnic. His transcendental identity is as relevant as ever, although so
many years have passed. And it will be relevant as long as we see extreme
nationalist parties to recover their power in Europe, as long as the gap among
rich and poor will widen and as long as identities like the one of Mr. F‘s will
consist a reason of oppression and exile. For this reason this article is
dedicated to him. Because with great respect to his family’s experiences, he
managed to maintain an identity, which doesn’t set national or religious limits
in our existence, bringing in this way solidarity one step closer, in a period
of legitimated hatred between the two countries.
^ To Mr. Fs’ of both
countries
Evs volunteers in Fokea
This is really a great piece and a very humanistic point of view. Truly a productive fruit of what we call the "cultural exchange", thanks :)
ReplyDelete